JMaille
About
- Username
- JMaille
- Joined
- Visits
- 21
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 263
- Badges
- 1
- Posts
- 33
Reactions
-
Trump has a problem with Tim Cook, because Foxconn is building factories in India
9secondkox2 said:jesusfreak said:These comments, "it is impossible", are frankly BS and why we are facing the problems we are facing now. The truth will end up somewhere in the middle. Many companies CAN do more here in the US. As Americans we have become addicted to cheap labor at our own long term expense. We can do MORE in the USA. Maybe some things don't make sense, but we have to realize that many of the "cheap" products we are buying, are part of why our national debt is getting cranked up. We are paying, whether we see it out the cashier or not. We are also paying a lot for many middle men in Pharmaceuticals, Health Care, Education and more. There are a lot of unproductive people out there leaching off the American taxpayer. If I have to pay $500 more for an iPhone and it starts to bring down our debt, so be it. Bash Trump all you want. He's the only President in recent history to have the balls to face these facts and at least TRY to do something about the problems. It takes a BIG PUSHER to move BIG BUREAUCRACIES and the status quo. The middle men will not give up their loot easily.Really?
"It is impossible" -- a short form way of saying it is financially imprudent for a CEO to suggest such a thing because it will cause the company to loose a great deal of money, the CEO will loose their job, and the next CEO won't even suggest it -- so in short impossible is a good choice of words.
"Many companies can do more here in the US." -- Yes they can. They could also just liquidate their companies and give the money to their stockholders, but that isn't what most companies are in business for, though it has been done in the past.
"As Americans we have become addicted to cheap labor..." -- Since we're talking about Apple I'll point out that what their suppliers are paying in labor isn't all that cheap in relative terms. The labor is very skilled, which means it's not cheap. Skilled labor, by the way, that doesn't exist in the United States. Maybe the federal government could increase funding for education to help provide that labor. Oh, wait, the plan is to get rid of the Department of Education., so that's not going to happen.
"...are part of why our national debt is getting cranked up..." -- Just no, that is not how the national debt works at all. The national debt is the amount of money the federal government has borrowed to cover the outstanding balance of expenses incurred over time. How would that be reduced by companies moving things to the US where they will be more expensive to make. Those expense will be going to equipment and labor costs, not to pay down the national debt. If anything it might even cause the national debt to go up because revenue for those companies would likely go down due to expenses resulting them paying less in taxes, they would have additional business costs which they would write off their taxes. Sure income tax for the new labors would increase paid taxes but certainly not by the amounts the companies would be taking off their taxes. Additionally, the companies would have to borrow the money to startup the factories which would increase the overall money supply and over all debt, which is of questionable help to the overall economy...
"We are also paying a lot of middle men..." -- Standard conservative opinion that is of questionable truth, but the big thing is what has that got to do with anything with regards to Apple making products in the United States rather than other countries? I guess Apple's non-owned and operated retailers are middlemen, but here in the United States, they are mostly US companies, employing US workers. I suppose in a sense Apple is a middleman because they don't actually make most of their products but... I just don't get your point.
"There are a lot of unproductive people out there leaching off the American taxpayer." -- Again nothing to do with the conversation but being a liberal that lives in a majority liberal state that in aggregate pays significantly more in taxes to the federal government than the money sends back to my state, so that my taxes can go to the many majority conservative states that in aggregate get more in money from the federal government than they pay in taxes, maybe I can/should agree with this one.
"If I have to pay $500 more for an iPhone and it starts to bring down our debt, so be it." --- First I don't believe you. You won't pay $500 more because if you would you'd already be sending that $500 to the federal government directly as an add on to your taxes, after all there is a place to make a contribution on your tax forms. But you're not doing that either, are you, so this statement simply isn't true, is it? And, again, it isn't going to impact the national debt because by definition it would be simply be going to the higher cost of manufacturing in the US.
"Bash Trump all you want." -- Okay, Donald Trump is an apparent pathological liar, a failed business man who has run numerous companies in to bankruptcy, a racist, a sexist, a mysoginist, a convicted felon, a serial sexual predator, a man that has committed acts of espionage against the US... I could go on, but you said bash him, and I don't think that repeating FACTS about him as determined by the courts and his own statements amounts to "bashing him."
"...only President in recent history to have the balls to face these facts..." -- What facts? You haven't presented any facts, just your opinions and the repeated mindless conservative drivel that so many people seem to believe because they apparently don't want to think for themselves.
The reality is that Donald Trump seems to like chaos. There is a school of thought that believes that a business gets the best outcomes from chaos. (You can google that if you want.) The thing is, the economy as a whole hates chaos. In simple terms it makes planning and investment extremely difficult and extremely risky. (You can google that too.)
Really, it appears that Donald Trump doesn't even understand what a tariff is. He keeps saying foreign countries pay them, but that isn't true at all (okay, it's a lie). Tariffs are a tax paid by the residents of the country that has applied the tariff. Tariffs have their place as part of an organized approach to building or protecting acting a specific industry, but that isn't what he's doing. He had his flunkies make up some otherwise meaningless numbers that they turned into a percentage, and he started a trade war with the rest of the world. Of course slowly, he has returned a few areas back to almost where they were in the beginning, declared victory, and said "Oh, look how great I am!"
Of course, I recognize the real truth here... neither 9secondcox2 nor jesusfreak are going to read this and even if they do they won't believe it, they'll call it all lies and liberal BS and say I don't know anything about what I am talking about. (That is unless it just outright gets deleted by an admin for some questionable reason.)
The fact is, right now, the way things are going, we (the entire world, though the US in particular) are royally and definitely fucked. If not because of the damage being done by this president and his minions, by the tens of millions of people in this country that don't believe in the value of expertise, science, facts, reality, the law, or the constitution anymore and think this guy is the greatest president the US has ever seen and he is going to Make America Great Again -- a slogan, which of course he stole from someone else (you can Google that too).
-
Apple tests EU by adding scare screens to apps using third-party payments [u]
I find it curious that something that tells you a fact that is absolutely true is referred to as a "scare screen."
Also why would this be a scare screen for people who are intentionally looking for apps that don't use Apple's eco-structure?
Amd finally, does anyone know whether the EU has something like the 5th and 14th amendments to the US Constitution that explicitly prevent the government and the courts from forcing someone to provide things to others without compensation? --- Oh, wait, I guess that doesn't matter, we don't follow those rules in the US anymore so why should the EU? -
iPhone Mirroring may expose your personal app use to your boss
I guess I did forget to mention the issue of companies allowing employees to access company network systems with personal devices. But then when you have major corporations allowing random HVAC contractors full access to the corporate network (including retail and credit card systems) just to monitor the temperature in some stockroom somewhere, why be worried about what some unhappy employee might steal from you or do to your company network. -
iPhone Mirroring may expose your personal app use to your boss
I know for many people this is easier said than done (potentially even being impossible) but you should never, never use a personal phone, computer, tablet, or any other personal device for work for an employer. And it follows that you should never setup a personal device to have any type of connection or visibility of any of your employer's network or data. Doing so can bring about a ton of problems from a legal standpoint. In the situation described in this article a company could argue that being able to tell what is on the personal phone is not a bug, but a feature -- because they have to be able to protect their systems and network from potential malicious devices. And that follows anytime you use a personal device for your employer's benefit. They can argue that they need full access to the device (i.e. they need to search it) to protect the company and you as the employee using the device in this manner is a tacit agreement to such search. And then there is the whole issue of if someone sues or criminally charges your employer. Your personal device then becomes just another piece of evidence they may be able to get full legal access to regardless of the device's status as "personal." FYI, not a lawyer but there is a ton of information about this out there on this type of thing -- I'm surprised people are still doing it. BYOD is a huge red flag for anyone looking for a position with a company. -
Apple prepares to enable sideloading and App Store changes in EU